• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Gameranx

Gameranx

Video Game News, Lists & Guides

  • News
  • Features
  • Platforms
    • Xbox Series X
    • PS5
    • Nintendo
  • Videos
  • Upcoming Games
  • Guides
  • News
  • Features
  • Platforms
    • Xbox Series X
    • PS5
    • Nintendo
  • Videos
  • Upcoming Games
  • Guides

Project Cars Studio Denies Intentionally Hamstringing AMD Card Performance

May 19, 2015 by Michael Fossbakk

Slightly Mad Studios wants the facts to speak for themselves.

A lengthy Reddit post has alleged that Slightly Mad Studios, the developer behind Project Cars, developed a version of PhysX with the purpose of it not running well on AMD video cards. The author of the Reddit post claims that Slightly Mad Studios did this because of a pre-existing relationship with Nvidia, AMD’s most direct competitor in the graphics card market.

Slightly Mad caught wind of the allegations and decided to respond with an official denial of the claims: "For the past few days, erroneous information posted on Reddit and other websites has spread misinformation with regards to Project Cars' performance on systems using AMD GPUs," it wrote in a statement. 

"To correct the wrongful assumptions regarding Project Cars’ performance on AMD GPUs, the Madness engine and the degree of involvement from our third-party technical partners, Slightly Mad Studios feel compelled to point out the following facts:

  • Project Cars is not a GameWorks product. We have a good working relationship with nVidia, as we do with AMD, but we have our own render technology which covers everything we need. 
  • NVidia are not "sponsors" of the project. The company has not received, and would not expect, financial assistance from third party hardware companies.
  • The Madness engine runs PhysX at only 50Hz and not at 600Hz as mentioned in several articles
  • The Madness engine uses PhysX for collision detection and dynamic objects, which is a small part of the overall physics systems
  • The Madness engine does not use PhysX for the SETA tyre model or for the chassis constraint solver (our two most expensive physics sub-systems)
  • The Madness engine does not use PhysX for the AI systems or for raycasting, we use a bespoke optimized solution for those
  • The physics systems run completely independently of the rendering and main game threads and utilizes 2 cores at 600Hz
  • The physics threading does not interact with the rendering, it is a push system sending updated positional information to the render bridge at 600Hz
  • Any performance difference with PhysX would not be reflected with differences in comparing rendering frame rates. There is no interaction between PhysX and the rendering
  • Overall, PhysX uses less than 10% of all physics thread CPU on PC. It is a very small part of the physics system so would not make a visual difference if run on the CPU or GPU
  • Direct involvement with both nVidia and AMD has been fruitful in assisting with the game performance at various stages of development. Both AMD and nVidia have had access to working builds of the game throughout development, and they have both tested builds and reported their results and offered suggestions for performance improvements.
  • Testing of the game with different driver versions has produced a variety of performance results on both nVidia and AMD hardware. This is entirely to be expected as driver changes cannot always be tested on every game and every card, and this is the reason why both companies produce game-specific driver profiles, to ensure that they can get the best out of the game.
  • Project CARS does not use nVidia specific particle technology – the system we use is a modified version of the same technology we used on the Need for Speed: Shift and Shift Unleashed games, and was entirely developed in-house. The reason the performance drops when there are a lot of particles on screen is simply because processing a large number of particles is very expensive."

Share this post:

FacebookTwitterLinkedInPinterest

Recent Videos

Donkey Kong Bananza - Before You Buy

Donkey Kong Bananza - Before You Buy

Ready or Not - Before You Buy

Ready or Not - Before You Buy

10 Game Moments That Broke Every Rule You Expected

10 Game Moments That Broke Every Rule You Expected

The Story Behind 2025's Biggest Gaming Disaster

The Story Behind 2025's Biggest Gaming Disaster

10 Most BADASS Video Game Weapons of All Time

10 Most BADASS Video Game Weapons of All Time

10 Things Developers REGRETTED Adding To BIG GAMES

10 Things Developers REGRETTED Adding To BIG GAMES

20 Games That HUMILIATE You For Playing BADLY

20 Games That HUMILIATE You For Playing BADLY

EA SETS INSANE TARGET FOR BATTLEFIELD 6, SUBNAUTICA 2 IN TROUBLE & MORE

EA SETS INSANE TARGET FOR BATTLEFIELD 6, SUBNAUTICA 2 IN TROUBLE & MORE

10 Best Games Where The STORY SUCKS

10 Best Games Where The STORY SUCKS

Category: Updates

Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Donkey Kong Bananza Has Ways For You To Deal With Motion Sickness
  • Crash Bandicoot Creator Calls Out Remake For Key “Botch”
  • Mario Kart Tour Just Received A New Surprising Update
  • FBC: Firebreak Looks To Kickstart New Player Interest With Its First Major Update
  • Ghost of Yotei Developers Reveal Why They Moved Away From Jin Sakai

Copyright © 2025 · Gameranx · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme