• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Gameranx

Gameranx

Video Game News, Lists & Guides

  • News
  • Features
  • Platforms
    • Xbox Series X
    • PS5
    • Nintendo
  • Videos
  • Upcoming Games
  • Guides

SEC, Big Ten, Pac-12 all not signing up with EA

August 15, 2013 by Ryan Parreno

EA is not getting any collegiate football license.

It looks like the EA lawsuit regarding player likenesses is going to have lasting consequences for their football franchises, as the Southeastern Conference (SEC), Big Ten Conference and Pacific 12 Conference have all joined NCAA in deciding not to license their trademarks with EA for their future football games. 

Almost a month ago, EA and NCAA lost their lawsuit to the college athletes who alleged that EA used their likenesses without permission. In the fallout of said ruling, NCAA declared that they would not longer be licensing their name for EA's college football games. EA then cited a strong relationship with the Collegiate Licensing Company that would allow them to move forward with getting football licenses.

SEC released a statement explaining that each university decides separately if they want to license to video game companies for their football teams, but they have decided not to. They also point out that they have never licensed their trademark, as well as their teams or their players, to use in any video games.

Unlike the NCAA which cited financial concerns, SEC and the other big football college conferences have not provided any specific reason not to sign up with EA. However, their statement implies that they have seen the issues that could come about from signing up in such an agreement with EA, and may not want to get into a similar situation. If one were less cynical, one could say they are looking out for the players and schools themselves.

EA can still try to approach individual schools and players to get licenses, as well as smaller entities like the Atlantic Coast Conference, but could a football game without a license at all be all that bad? If their name means something in this industry, it shouldn't be a roadblock at all.

Source: ESPN

Share this post:

FacebookTwitterLinkedInPinterest

Recent Videos

10 GOTY Games That ARE STILL WORTH PLAYING

10 GOTY Games That ARE STILL WORTH PLAYING

10 BIGGEST REVEALS of Summer Game Fest 2026

10 BIGGEST REVEALS of Summer Game Fest 2026

CDPROJEKT RED NEW OPEN WORLD GAME, PS5 EXCLUSIVE SALES CRASHING? & MORE

CDPROJEKT RED NEW OPEN WORLD GAME, PS5 EXCLUSIVE SALES CRASHING? & MORE

10 Games That Are DEEPER THAN WE THOUGHT

10 Games That Are DEEPER THAN WE THOUGHT

Fatekeeper - Before You Buy

Fatekeeper - Before You Buy

10 BIG Announcements of State of Play June 2026

10 BIG Announcements of State of Play June 2026

Why This Witcher 3 Expansion Is Such A Big Deal

Why This Witcher 3 Expansion Is Such A Big Deal

30 RPGs of 2026 That Look Too Good to Ignore

30 RPGs of 2026 That Look Too Good to Ignore

Top 20 NEW Story Based Games of 2026

Top 20 NEW Story Based Games of 2026

Category: Updates

Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Resident Evil Veronica Releasing 2027 For PS5, Xbox Series X|S, Switch 2, and PC
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 Delivers The “Definitive” DMZ In The Center Of Korea
  • Gears Of War: E-Day Is Xbox’s Return To Console Exclusives
  • “It Was An Xbox Decision” – Satya Nadella Gave Asha Sharma “Latitude” To Cancel CoPilot On Xbox
  • Atlus Warns Public After Katsura Hashino Impersonator Fools Persona and Metaphor ReFantazio Fans

Copyright © 2026 · Gameranx · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme