• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Gameranx

Gameranx

Video Game News, Lists & Guides

  • News
  • Features
  • Platforms
    • Xbox Series X
    • PS5
    • Nintendo
  • Videos
  • Upcoming Games
  • Guides

Shareholder sues Activision Blizzard for buyback deal

August 5, 2013 by Ryan Parreno

Alleges purchase benefits insiders, not Activision.

The best laid schemes of gaming companies often go awry, and so Bobby Kotick's plan to make Activision Blizzard independent again is in trouble as the company's own shareholders are suing Bobby and company (so to speak).

Todd Miller is filing suit against Activision Blizzard, their board of directors, and parent company Vivendi, under allegations of breach of fiduciary duties, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment.

As a brief recap, Kotick succesfully negotiated a deal for Activision Blizzard to buy back 439 million shares from Vivendi for a total $ 58.83 billion. A separate investment group which includes Kotick is buying remaining 172 million shares for $ 2.34 billion.

Miller's suit alleges that even though the deal will make the company 100 % independent, it does not benefit Activision Blizzard in any way. Furthermore, Miller is suspicious of the sweetheart deal given to the investment group, which will make it the single largest shareholder in the company.

There are conflicts of interest in the deal, as many of Activision Blizzard's 11 shareholders are set to retire when this deal is consummated. As former Vivendi executives as well, they are unlikely to turn down their former company's offer. Overall, the investment group stands to profit by $ 664 million. Miller wants the courts to stop the purchase and to limit Activision from arranging for similar one-sided deals.

To be fair, we don't really know of any instances of Vivendi intruding in how Activision Blizzard (or its other companies for that matter) does its business. On the other hand, there's something about being as independent as Valve that allows you to take risks and try things you wouldn't be able to otherwise.

Was the purchase deal a genuine attempt to spin off from Vivendi or a cash grab by Kotick and his colleagues? The courts will be deciding soon.

Image is from Diablo III

Source: Courthouse News Service

Share this post:

FacebookTwitterLinkedInPinterest

Recent Videos

10 Weird Gaming Stories of July 2026

10 Weird Gaming Stories of July 2026

PLAYSTATION RESPONDS TO PHYSICAL DISC BACKLASH & more

PLAYSTATION RESPONDS TO PHYSICAL DISC BACKLASH & more

Why Assassin's Creed Odyssey Was Almost A Masterpiece

Why Assassin's Creed Odyssey Was Almost A Masterpiece

10 Worst In-Game Decisions I Shouldn't Have Made

10 Worst In-Game Decisions I Shouldn't Have Made

What's The Most Expensive Gaming Thing Ever?

What's The Most Expensive Gaming Thing Ever?

20 NEW Survival Games of 2026

20 NEW Survival Games of 2026

Marvel's Wolverine: 10 Things You NEED TO KNOW

Marvel's Wolverine: 10 Things You NEED TO KNOW

20 RPGs That NEVER REALLY END

20 RPGs That NEVER REALLY END

10 Games Other Game Companies WANTED TO END

10 Games Other Game Companies WANTED TO END

Category: Updates

Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • PlayStation Is Not Seeing “Any Impact To Our Business” For Cancelling Physical Games – Just Before #PSBlackout Starts
  • Super Mario Sunshine And Two Unreleased Virtual Boy Games Are Coming To Nintendo Switch Online
  • Sony CFO Lin Tao Says They Understand The Community’s “Emotions” About The End Of Physical PlayStation Games
  • “No Battle Pass, No Bullshit” – Gears Of War: E-Day Goes Old School On Customization Items
  • FBI Asking Steam Malware Victims To Contact Them After Recent Crackdown

Copyright © 2026 · Gameranx · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme