• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Gameranx

Gameranx

Video Game News, Lists & Guides

  • News
  • Features
  • Platforms
    • Xbox Series X
    • PS5
    • Nintendo
  • Videos
  • Upcoming Games
  • Guides

Shareholder sues Activision Blizzard for buyback deal

August 5, 2013 by Ryan Parreno

Alleges purchase benefits insiders, not Activision.

The best laid schemes of gaming companies often go awry, and so Bobby Kotick's plan to make Activision Blizzard independent again is in trouble as the company's own shareholders are suing Bobby and company (so to speak).

Todd Miller is filing suit against Activision Blizzard, their board of directors, and parent company Vivendi, under allegations of breach of fiduciary duties, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment.

As a brief recap, Kotick succesfully negotiated a deal for Activision Blizzard to buy back 439 million shares from Vivendi for a total $ 58.83 billion. A separate investment group which includes Kotick is buying remaining 172 million shares for $ 2.34 billion.

Miller's suit alleges that even though the deal will make the company 100 % independent, it does not benefit Activision Blizzard in any way. Furthermore, Miller is suspicious of the sweetheart deal given to the investment group, which will make it the single largest shareholder in the company.

There are conflicts of interest in the deal, as many of Activision Blizzard's 11 shareholders are set to retire when this deal is consummated. As former Vivendi executives as well, they are unlikely to turn down their former company's offer. Overall, the investment group stands to profit by $ 664 million. Miller wants the courts to stop the purchase and to limit Activision from arranging for similar one-sided deals.

To be fair, we don't really know of any instances of Vivendi intruding in how Activision Blizzard (or its other companies for that matter) does its business. On the other hand, there's something about being as independent as Valve that allows you to take risks and try things you wouldn't be able to otherwise.

Was the purchase deal a genuine attempt to spin off from Vivendi or a cash grab by Kotick and his colleagues? The courts will be deciding soon.

Image is from Diablo III

Source: Courthouse News Service

Share this post:

FacebookTwitterLinkedInPinterest

Recent Videos

10 BIGGEST Lies Ever Told by Developers

10 BIGGEST Lies Ever Told by Developers

Diablo 4: Lord of Hatred - Before You Buy

Diablo 4: Lord of Hatred - Before You Buy

20 Upcoming SMALLER Games of 2026 That Excite Us

20 Upcoming SMALLER Games of 2026 That Excite Us

Top 10 NEW Games of May 2026

Top 10 NEW Games of May 2026

20 Insane Things Games Did That NOBODY NOTICED

20 Insane Things Games Did That NOBODY NOTICED

20 Open World Games That MAKE YOU FEEL LONELY

20 Open World Games That MAKE YOU FEEL LONELY

AC BLACK FLAG REMAKE BIGGEST CHANGES & MORE

AC BLACK FLAG REMAKE BIGGEST CHANGES & MORE

Saros - Before You Buy

Saros - Before You Buy

How Capcom Did The IMPOSSIBLE

How Capcom Did The IMPOSSIBLE

Category: Updates

Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Take-Two Looking At Doing Something “With All Our Intellectual Property,” Like L.A. Noire
  • Denuvo And 2K Games Adds 14 Day Online Check To Their Games After DRM Is Compromised
  • Rumor: Valve’s Internal Pricing Targets For The New Steam Machine Have “Skyrocketed”
  • The Blood Of Dawnwalker Culls This September 3, Launch Details Revealed
  • Dataminers Believe They Have Solved The PS4/PS5 DRM “Mystery” – Will Sony Get Away With It?

Copyright © 2026 · Gameranx · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme