• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Gameranx

Gameranx

Video Game News, Lists & Guides

  • News
  • Features
  • Platforms
    • Xbox Series X
    • PS5
    • Nintendo
  • Videos
  • Upcoming Games
  • Guides

League of Legends: The Woes And Truths Of Communal Justice

March 19, 2013 by Cassandra Khaw

Lyte addressed the Tribunal System’s efficacy and failure rate.

Riot's Lead Designer of Social Systems, Lyte, recently addressed concerns about the Tribunal System with a lengthy post on the official forums. The Tribunal System, for those who don't know, is Riot's method of allowing the community to regulate itself via peer-review of oft-reported players. With a reported statistic of .7% player eligibility (from Lyte's post), this is something most players won't encounter. Still, some innocent players may, as is often the case with well-intended systems like this, trigger a false positive and face punishment. This notion of nontoxic players falling victim to the system is what Lyte addresses in his post: 

"… the Tribunal isn't perfect. No system is. A lot of players might argue that if even 1 positive player is banned that the system is broken. This is unreasonable. The reality of the situation is, errors are going to happen–the question we should be asking is, 'What is the acceptable error rate?'

 One of the first things we did with the system was optimize it to minimize false punishes. Since the player behavior team formed, we have not seen a positive player that was punished enough times by the Tribunal that they were permabanned. Some neutral or positive players receive undeserved warnings or timebans, but no one has been so absurdly unlucky as to end up in the Tribunal 5 times and ended with a permanent ban.

In saying this, we see a lot of complaints that the Tribunal is broken; if we were really punishing that many positive players, I'd shut the Tribunal down today. …  When a banned player goes to the forums and complains about the system being broken, we're missing the counterbalance of that–how many players got a ban that was deserved, but don't go on the forums to post about it?"

He goes on to acknowledge that bans are not the complete solution and talk about the team's shift toward encouraging better behavior instead. He also discusses his beliefs about just how healthy and positive – despite how it may sometimes seem – the community really is. Solid read. Check it out at http://na.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?p=35694081#35694081

Share this post:

FacebookTwitterLinkedInPinterest

Recent Videos

20 OVERHYPED Games That Actually Delivered

20 OVERHYPED Games That Actually Delivered

10 DUMBEST Things That BROKE Video Games

10 DUMBEST Things That BROKE Video Games

10 MIND BLOWING Moments in Recent Games

10 MIND BLOWING Moments in Recent Games

Is This Already The WORST Game of 2026?

Is This Already The WORST Game of 2026?

ELDER SCROLLS 6 RELEASE DELAY EXPLAINED, NEW GAME LETS YOU BE GOD & MORE

ELDER SCROLLS 6 RELEASE DELAY EXPLAINED, NEW GAME LETS YOU BE GOD & MORE

Hytale - Before You Buy

Hytale - Before You Buy

10 Recent Good Games That Didn't Sell Well

10 Recent Good Games That Didn't Sell Well

10 NEW Fan Discoveries That'll Get You Playing Again

10 NEW Fan Discoveries That'll Get You Playing Again

Does UBISOFT Deserve A Comeback?

Does UBISOFT Deserve A Comeback?

Category: Updates

Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Roblox: What are Trusted Connections and How to Add Them
  • Pokemon Go: How to Encounter and Fight Giovanni (January 2026)
  • Borderlands 4 Switch 2 Game-Key Card Appears In Portugal Online Game Store
  • Cyberpunk 2077 VR Mod DMCA’d By CD Projekt RED For Being A Paid Mod
  • Rumor: Did Fable Production Art Confirm The Return Of Bloodstone and Wraithmarsh?

Copyright © 2026 · Gameranx · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme