• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Gameranx

Gameranx

Video Game News, Lists & Guides

  • News
  • Features
  • Platforms
    • Xbox Series X
    • PS5
    • Nintendo
  • Videos
  • Upcoming Games
  • Guides

Leland Yee Apologises for Accusing Gamers of Having a ‘Lust for Violence’

January 30, 2013 by Jordan Erica Webber

Yee claims to respect ‘many gamers’

Following the response to Leland Yee's suggestion that gamers should “quiet down” because their “lust for violence” gives them “no credibility” in the argument on gun violence, the California State Senator has Tweeted an apology. Of sorts.

Gamers, I admittedly didnt use best words to SFchron. Meant video game industry has inherent conflict of interest in the gun violence debate

— Leland Yee (@LelandYee) January 25, 2013

I have a lot of respect for many gamers – many are on my staff and in my family – but the industry has profited at the expense of children.

— Leland Yee (@LelandYee) January 25, 2013

Okay, so he accidentally used the wrong phrase. It can happen in an interview, although as one of the replies to the Tweet points out, “lust for violence” is quite a bit stronger than “conflict of interest”:

@lelandyee You meant "conflict of interest" but accidentally said "lust for violence"? Woops!

— Mark Ryan Sallee (@MRSallee) January 26, 2013

And on that line of thought, what is our conflict of interest as far as the actual issue of gun violence is concerned? Gamers wouldn't be considered a group with such a conflict had people like those reps from the NRA not brought us into the debate in the first place. If the very fact that we stand accused of contributing to the problem means we're no longer allowed to speak up, then does that mean the NRA has to shut up too? What if I publicly state that the issue of gun violence is just a problem with North America as a whole? Does that mean all its citizens have to “quiet down” too, and another country gets to step in and decide what to do about it? What a clever way to solve debates.

I'd like to state for the record that Leland Yee clearly has a conflict of interest as far as video games are concerned. Much as he might claim to have “a lot of respect for many gamers”, he is obviously biased against the industry and should “just quiet down” himself. Until he and others like him do so, why the hell should we?

Share this post:

FacebookTwitterLinkedInPinterest

Recent Videos

20 BEST Games of 2026 [FIRST HALF]

20 BEST Games of 2026 [FIRST HALF]

10 Most DISAPPOINTING Games of 2026 [First Half]

10 Most DISAPPOINTING Games of 2026 [First Half]

10 GAMES that Embarrass Modern AAA Games

10 GAMES that Embarrass Modern AAA Games

Skyrim in 2026 is A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT GAME

Skyrim in 2026 is A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT GAME

Top 20 NEW Games of 2026 [Second Half]

Top 20 NEW Games of 2026 [Second Half]

20 Games That FORCED YOU TO CHEAT

20 Games That FORCED YOU TO CHEAT

CRIMSON DESERT CHANGING ITS STORY? XBOX COMEBACK PLAN & MORE

CRIMSON DESERT CHANGING ITS STORY? XBOX COMEBACK PLAN & MORE

10 BIGGEST DISAPPOINTMENTS from Summer Game Fest

10 BIGGEST DISAPPOINTMENTS from Summer Game Fest

10 Games That REWARD You For Being CRAZY

10 Games That REWARD You For Being CRAZY

Category: Updates

Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Stop Killing Games Campaign Faces Huge Setback After EU Rejects Policy Proposal
  • The Latest Official PlayStation 5 SSDs Have Jumped In Price 4 X To As Much As $ 3000
  • Rumor: The Latest Senua Was Revealed In Xbox Game Showcase To Help XBOX Sell Off Ninja Theory
  • Nintendo Of America Dismisses Data Breach, Says No Personal Or Financial Info Were Accessed
  • XBOX’s Matthew Ball Debunks Rumor They Will “Reverse Course” On Console Exclusives

Copyright © 2026 · Gameranx · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme