• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Gameranx

Gameranx

Video Game News, Lists & Guides

  • News
  • Features
  • Platforms
    • Xbox Series X
    • PS5
    • Nintendo
  • Videos
  • Upcoming Games
  • Guides

Rumor: This Might Be Why The Vita Switched From OLED To LCD Screens

January 26, 2014 by Ryan Parreno

Sony may not have been forthcoming on this, but the news trail seems to have revealed details that point to the real reason.

A fan site has proposed an alternate theory regarding the Vita 2000’s switch from OLED to LCD screens.

As you may know, Sony’s official position is they feel that LCD screens have reached the point where they can match the image quality of OLEDs, therefore, they have switched to LCDs. Unfortunately, we have to point out that this is a barefaced lie.

We’ll point to an Amazon feature explaining the differences between LCD and OLED screens to the average consumer, to decide on buying TV screens. While both are capable of displaying vivid colors, OLEDs can also display deeper, more accurate blacks, causing colored backgrounds to appear sharper. Furthermore, LCDs spend more energy. The only edge LCDs have over OLEDs is that they are cheaper.

Now, the alternate theory proposed points to the end of their OLED TV development agreement with Panasonic at the end of last year. They both confirm that they did not meet the desired targets in developing the technology, and it seems unlikely that they would be able to make it commercially viable in the near future. If things had worked out, OLEDs could have been popular enough that it would have driven manufacturing costs down, but that’s not what happened here.

So, as a consequence of the dissolution of that deal, Sony may have lost access to those OLEDs. Rather than buy the screens in a less than favorable deal, they opted to go LCD.

For what it’s worth, having tried the Vita 2000 firsthand, I think the switch from OLED to LCD does not matter in terms of portable play. The screens are not so big that the difference affects gameplay, and it’s not directly comparable to the images generated on a TV. Furthermore, Sony engineers did pull off some hocus pocus, making LCD power consumption equivalent to OLED power consumption. Overall, I do think the Vita 2000 is better at being a portable than the 1st model, even if it does not have all the ideal bells and whistles that fans claim they want. I think Sony would be better served being forthcoming about all this as well, so that consumers make informed choices.

Share this post:

FacebookTwitterLinkedInPinterest

Recent Videos

What The HELL Is Going On With Nvidia DLSS 5?

What The HELL Is Going On With Nvidia DLSS 5?

20 Upcoming Games That CROSS THE LINE OF INSANITY

20 Upcoming Games That CROSS THE LINE OF INSANITY

10 Video Game Graphics That STILL Hold Up

10 Video Game Graphics That STILL Hold Up

The Best cRPG Ever Made?

The Best cRPG Ever Made?

20 Things Developers Knew WE WOULD TRY

20 Things Developers Knew WE WOULD TRY

WHY CRIMSON DESERT LOOKS THIS GOOD & MORE

WHY CRIMSON DESERT LOOKS THIS GOOD & MORE

10 TERRIBLE Games That Are Absolutely Hilarious

10 TERRIBLE Games That Are Absolutely Hilarious

John Carpenter's Toxic Commando - Before You Buy

John Carpenter's Toxic Commando - Before You Buy

20 Best Games of 2015-2025 YOU NEED TO REVISIT

20 Best Games of 2015-2025 YOU NEED TO REVISIT

Category: Updates

Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Nvidia CEO Says DLSS 5 Is “Not Generative AI, It’s Content-Control Generative AI”
  • Generative AI Already Hurt Video Games Before Supply Issues And DLSS 5 – By Way Of AI Apps
  • Subnautica 2 Enters Early Access This May, But Without The Developer’s Founders Anymore
  • Pikmin Were Just Confirmed For The Super Mario Galaxy Movie
  • Disabled ARC Raiders Player Confirms Embark Has Reversed Their Erroneous Permaban

Copyright © 2026 · Gameranx · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme