• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Gameranx

Gameranx

Video Game News, Lists & Guides

  • News
  • Features
  • Platforms
    • Xbox Series X
    • PS5
    • Nintendo
  • Videos
  • Upcoming Games
  • Guides

SEC, Big Ten, Pac-12 all not signing up with EA

August 15, 2013 by Ryan Parreno

EA is not getting any collegiate football license.

It looks like the EA lawsuit regarding player likenesses is going to have lasting consequences for their football franchises, as the Southeastern Conference (SEC), Big Ten Conference and Pacific 12 Conference have all joined NCAA in deciding not to license their trademarks with EA for their future football games. 

Almost a month ago, EA and NCAA lost their lawsuit to the college athletes who alleged that EA used their likenesses without permission. In the fallout of said ruling, NCAA declared that they would not longer be licensing their name for EA's college football games. EA then cited a strong relationship with the Collegiate Licensing Company that would allow them to move forward with getting football licenses.

SEC released a statement explaining that each university decides separately if they want to license to video game companies for their football teams, but they have decided not to. They also point out that they have never licensed their trademark, as well as their teams or their players, to use in any video games.

Unlike the NCAA which cited financial concerns, SEC and the other big football college conferences have not provided any specific reason not to sign up with EA. However, their statement implies that they have seen the issues that could come about from signing up in such an agreement with EA, and may not want to get into a similar situation. If one were less cynical, one could say they are looking out for the players and schools themselves.

EA can still try to approach individual schools and players to get licenses, as well as smaller entities like the Atlantic Coast Conference, but could a football game without a license at all be all that bad? If their name means something in this industry, it shouldn't be a roadblock at all.

Source: ESPN

Share this post:

FacebookTwitterLinkedInPinterest

Recent Videos

10 Recent Good Games That Didn't Sell Well

10 Recent Good Games That Didn't Sell Well

10 NEW Fan Discoveries That'll Get You Playing Again

10 NEW Fan Discoveries That'll Get You Playing Again

Does UBISOFT Deserve A Comeback?

Does UBISOFT Deserve A Comeback?

Top 25 NEW Action RPGs of 2026

Top 25 NEW Action RPGs of 2026

10 Gaming Ideas They Thought Were Good...BUT NO

10 Gaming Ideas They Thought Were Good...BUT NO

10 DLCs That BROKE THE GAME

10 DLCs That BROKE THE GAME

NEW Post-Apocalyptic Game Looks Insane, Another GTA 6 DELAY? & More

NEW Post-Apocalyptic Game Looks Insane, Another GTA 6 DELAY? & More

Top 20 NEW PS5 Games of 2026

Top 20 NEW PS5 Games of 2026

10 Video Game Things That DIED in 2025

10 Video Game Things That DIED in 2025

Category: Updates

Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Pokémon Go: How to get Sinnoh Stones
  • Hidetaka Miyazaki Calls Bloodborne The “Strongest Flavoring Of My Type Of Game”
  • Rumor: PS5 Pro’s “PSSR 2.0” FSR4 Update Coming January To March
  • The Disney Afternoon Collection Received A New ESRB Rating For Nintendo Switch and Switch 2
  • Here Are Some More Confirmed GTA 6 Company Brands

Copyright © 2026 · Gameranx · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme