• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Gameranx

Gameranx

Video Game News, Lists & Guides

  • News
  • Features
  • Platforms
    • Xbox Series X
    • PS5
    • Nintendo
  • Videos
  • Upcoming Games
  • Guides

Tom Clancy’s The Division Delay: What Does It Mean?

May 21, 2015 by Ian Miles Cheong

What does the delay for Tom Clancy’s The Division mean for the game?

Watch Dogs’ delay sent an important message to the creators of Tom Clancy’s The Division, its creators at Ubisoft Massive stated last year. They said that the delay of Watch Dogs was “tremendously important” for them as a developer studio to know that the owner and publisher, Ubisoft, was willing to take a hit on time and resources to release a polished product.

Despite the fact that Watch Dogs wasn’t anywhere as great as fans were hoping it would be, it would have been a much worse game had they released it on time when it was originally due for release. 

It would seem that the creators of The Division are taking that lesson to heart, as they’ve delayed the game, which was slated for release during Fall 2015, by yet another year–to 2016. 

Despite putting out a few very good games on the market, Ubisoft has developed a reputation of releasing buggy products like Assassin’s Creed Unity and The Crew, and it would seem that they are intent on seeing that The Division does not suffer the same fate as the two aforementioned titles. 

So what do the delays for the game mean, exactly?

For starters, the game they are promising is absolutely massive–an open-world, massively multiplayer third person shooter with role-playing elements. The delays would mean being able to deliver on what they have promised, and adding a fine coat of polish to the game. 

I think all fans of the title can agree that it would be better for us to wait another year for them to release the game than to get something they slapped together to meet a deadline just for the sake of playing it.

If anything, it doesn’t seem that the delays mean that the game has run into some major, unfixable problems that cannot be resolved. On the contrary, I think it means that they are simply developing the title the way it ought to be made–with time, effort, and care. After all, rushing hardly helped Ubisoft’s previous titles. 

As Nintendo’s Shigeru Miyamoto once said, “A delayed game is eventually good, but a rushed game is forever bad.” 

Share this post:

FacebookTwitterLinkedInPinterest

Recent Videos

WHY CRIMSON DESERT LOOKS THIS GOOD & MORE

WHY CRIMSON DESERT LOOKS THIS GOOD & MORE

10 TERRIBLE Games That Are Absolutely Hilarious

10 TERRIBLE Games That Are Absolutely Hilarious

John Carpenter's Toxic Commando - Before You Buy

John Carpenter's Toxic Commando - Before You Buy

20 Best Games of 2015-2025 YOU NEED TO REVISIT

20 Best Games of 2015-2025 YOU NEED TO REVISIT

10 Dumb & SECRET Things FOUND In Resident Evil 9: Requiem

10 Dumb & SECRET Things FOUND In Resident Evil 9: Requiem

IS Control Resonant The BIGGEST SURPRISE of 2026?

IS Control Resonant The BIGGEST SURPRISE of 2026?

10 Recent AAA Games That SUCKED

10 Recent AAA Games That SUCKED

Pokémon Pokopia - Before You Buy

Pokémon Pokopia - Before You Buy

WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON WITH XBOX & SONY, NEW GAME REVEALS & MORE

WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON WITH XBOX & SONY, NEW GAME REVEALS & MORE

Category: Updates

Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • C4SH Finally Joins Borderlands 4 In Story Pack 1: Mad Ellie And The Vault Of The Damned
  • Call Of Duty Black Ops Royale Launching Regional Matchmaking Test In Europe and The Middle East
  • Crimson Desert Found Dropping To 30 FPS In PS5 Pro’s Performance Mode – Will It Be OK Post Day One Patch?
  • Questions About Crimson Desert Arise Over Denuvo, A Day One Patch, And Performance Issues
  • Post Malone Is Playing GTA 6 When It Comes Out Because He’s “A Human Being”

Copyright © 2026 · Gameranx · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme