• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer
Gameranx

Gameranx

Video Game News, Lists & Guides

  • News
  • Features
  • Platforms
    • Xbox Series X
    • PS5
    • Nintendo
  • Videos
  • Upcoming Games
  • Guides

League of Legends: The Woes And Truths Of Communal Justice

March 19, 2013 by Cassandra Khaw

Lyte addressed the Tribunal System’s efficacy and failure rate.

Riot's Lead Designer of Social Systems, Lyte, recently addressed concerns about the Tribunal System with a lengthy post on the official forums. The Tribunal System, for those who don't know, is Riot's method of allowing the community to regulate itself via peer-review of oft-reported players. With a reported statistic of .7% player eligibility (from Lyte's post), this is something most players won't encounter. Still, some innocent players may, as is often the case with well-intended systems like this, trigger a false positive and face punishment. This notion of nontoxic players falling victim to the system is what Lyte addresses in his post: 

"… the Tribunal isn't perfect. No system is. A lot of players might argue that if even 1 positive player is banned that the system is broken. This is unreasonable. The reality of the situation is, errors are going to happen–the question we should be asking is, 'What is the acceptable error rate?'

 One of the first things we did with the system was optimize it to minimize false punishes. Since the player behavior team formed, we have not seen a positive player that was punished enough times by the Tribunal that they were permabanned. Some neutral or positive players receive undeserved warnings or timebans, but no one has been so absurdly unlucky as to end up in the Tribunal 5 times and ended with a permanent ban.

In saying this, we see a lot of complaints that the Tribunal is broken; if we were really punishing that many positive players, I'd shut the Tribunal down today. …  When a banned player goes to the forums and complains about the system being broken, we're missing the counterbalance of that–how many players got a ban that was deserved, but don't go on the forums to post about it?"

He goes on to acknowledge that bans are not the complete solution and talk about the team's shift toward encouraging better behavior instead. He also discusses his beliefs about just how healthy and positive – despite how it may sometimes seem – the community really is. Solid read. Check it out at http://na.leagueoflegends.com/board/showthread.php?p=35694081#35694081

Share this post:

FacebookTwitterLinkedInPinterest

Recent Videos

30 RPGs of 2026 That Look Too Good to Ignore

30 RPGs of 2026 That Look Too Good to Ignore

Top 20 NEW Story Based Games of 2026

Top 20 NEW Story Based Games of 2026

10 WEIRD Gaming Stories of May 2026

10 WEIRD Gaming Stories of May 2026

GTA 6 REVIEWS "IMPORTANT", UNREAL ENGINE 6 REVEALED & MORE

GTA 6 REVIEWS "IMPORTANT", UNREAL ENGINE 6 REVEALED & MORE

10 SNEAKY Tricks Games USE WITHOUT TELLING YOU

10 SNEAKY Tricks Games USE WITHOUT TELLING YOU

007 First Light: 10 Things The Game DOESN'T TELL YOU

007 First Light: 10 Things The Game DOESN'T TELL YOU

State of Play June 2026 - 10 Predictions We ARE DESPERATE FOR

State of Play June 2026 - 10 Predictions We ARE DESPERATE FOR

007 First Light - Before You Buy

007 First Light - Before You Buy

10 Games That CHANGE If You Play Them WRONG

10 Games That CHANGE If You Play Them WRONG

Category: Updates

Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • GTA Online Cheaters’ Personal Info Leaked – By Someone Who Fell For A Scam Himself
  • Rumor: Break In (FKA Fairgame$) Will Be In Today’s State of Play
  • Rumor: Star Wars Eclipse Is In Dev Hell, NetEase Could Sell Quantic Dream Before 2026 Ends
  • Nintendo Music Now Playable In Web Browser, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto
  • Rumor: Valve Threatened To Remove Ubisoft & WB Games Titles From Steam Over Pricing Parity

Copyright © 2026 · Gameranx · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme