FTC Confirms Kotick’s Claim Lina Khan Met With CMA Before Activision Decision
Bobby Kotick has pointed out that the regulators aren't understanding the market conditions and why these companies are looking for these mergers in the first place.

Bobby Kotick has pointed out that the regulators aren't understanding the market conditions and why these companies are looking for these mergers in the first place.

It's a serious escalation to prompt the head of state to respond.

This decision really goes beyond a console gamer war, to people's jobs and livelihoods in the UK, where the CMA is based.

Microsoft and Activision are dead set on getting this deal to go through.

The CMA weighed benefits of the deal, and Microsoft's remedies, before reaching their decision.

Even as this deal seems set to close, new competition investigations seem set to begin, this time vs Sony.

The Financial Times doesn't have any insider to back up their claim, but admittedly, it is also what most observers think.

It's clear at this point it isn't just a handful of senators and congresspeople - the US government has taken an interest in the Microsoft- Activision deal, and in Sony's game industry dominance.

The lawsuit now uses arguments that have already failed to convince the CMA.

Activision is no longer hesitant to tell the world what they think of Sony.

It's good news for Microsoft, but awkward given other recent news about the US Congress' interest in Japan's market.

This disagreement between Microsoft and Activision is one of those details you could miss if you were only paying attention to Sony's and Microsoft's back and forth.

Activision's claim is credible, but Microsoft's statement is counter to what the company has been building in the past few years.

It's an unusual arrangement, that amounts to Microsoft forcing Sony to let them make Call of Duty better for PlayStation players.

It's probably true that Call of Duty is a small segment of the PlayStation user base, but still makes a lot of money for them.

The UK regulator did their due diligence in looking at other big money shooter games, including the likes of Fortnite.

Most gamers probably take for granted how ubiquitous some of these publishers are.

Activision’s response to the CMA’s provisional findings is clear and direct. In that they bluntly tell the CMA they are wrong.

This seems to be a frivolous lawsuit filed by lawyers looking for a quick buck.

One of the CMA's respondents has even said that they believe the deal will create a level playing field between Xbox and PlayStation, and help smaller game companies like them.

Pachter isn't always right, but this is a good enough argument that Microsoft can use it to defend their deal.

This move comes as UK's CMA is finalizing their decision on the Microsoft - Activision deal.

This isn't Meservey acting like a wild card anymore, this is Activision saying and doing what they have to to defend the deal.

This argument won't end the debate about the Microsoft - Activision deal, but it should whittle down Sony's arguments even further.
